Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Yes, that was considered and rejected, IIRC. What is your definition
>> of equality for xml?
> I'd vote for !memcmp().
Surely not. xml is not text.
regards, tom lane