On 02.07.23 20:31, Andres Freund wrote:
> A lot of platforms have "libbacktrace" available, e.g. as part of gcc. I think
> we should consider using it, when available, to produce more useful
> backtraces.
>
> I hacked it up for ereport() to debug something, and the backtraces are
> considerably better:
Makes sense. When we first added backtrace support, we considered
libunwind, which didn't really give better backtraces than the built-in
stuff, so it wasn't worth dealing with an additional dependency.