Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Hilbert, Sebastian" <Sebastian(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Date: 2013-11-22 20:33:01
Message-ID: 25098.1385152381@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> writes:
> Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> wrote:
>> See the attached patch.

> Trying that again.

That looks sane for pg_dump, but I would rather have expected that
pg_dumpall would need to emit the same thing (possibly more than once
due to reconnections).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2013-11-22 20:45:25 Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2013-11-22 20:29:58 Re: tsvector stemmer issue

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2013-11-22 20:45:25 Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Previous Message Karsten Hilbert 2013-11-22 20:27:27 Re: pg_upgrade ?deficiency