Re: Foreign key referential action timing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Foreign key referential action timing
Date: 2004-10-21 21:36:36
Message-ID: 25095.1098394596@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> writes:
> While not exactly what the spec invisions, I believe we can come
> closer to the correct behavior by treating all of the referential actions
> as non-deferrable while allowing deferment of NO ACTION and the check
> itself.

Since no one seems to have objected, I've applied this patch.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2004-10-21 21:54:33 Re: code question: storing INTO relation
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-10-21 20:28:46 Links to OSDL test results up