Re: table/index fillfactor control

ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> "Jonah H. Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> There's 4 shift/reduce conflicts which I believe are caused by having
>> used WITH... did you plan to fix this?

> Thanks for pointing out. I realized it is a confliction between
> WITH OIDS and WITH (options).

> I'll try to treat CreateStmt.hasoids as one of the options internally,
> with SQL-level backward compatibility.

There was some discussion recently about how we'll have to make WITH
a fully reserved keyword eventually anyway to handle SQL99 recursive
queries. I'm not sure if that's really true, but reserving WITH is
a fallback position we should consider, if avoiding the shift/reduce
conflict seems unreasonably messy otherwise.

regards, tom lane