From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: What's our minimum supported Python version? |
Date: | 2025-04-19 17:38:31 |
Message-ID: | 25043.1745084311@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 19 Apr 2025, at 7:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I think we need to do some combination of moving our
>> minimum-supported-version goalposts forward, making sure that
>> whatever we claim is the minimum Python version is actually
>> being tested in the buildfarm, and fixing oauth_server.py
>> so that it works on that version.
> From an Python ecosystem perspective,
> 3.9 is the usual minimum that people use in CI matrices nowdays.
> So if it was up to me, that’s what I’d choose.
Per these numbers, that would be cutting off 31% of the buildfarm,
including a lot of still-in-support distros such as RHEL8.
So I would say that's not likely to be our choice.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chapman Flack | 2025-04-19 18:28:09 | Re: transforms |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-04-19 17:28:15 | Re: [BUG] temporary file usage report with extended protocol and unnamed portals |