From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Scott Schulthess" <scott(at)topozone(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Returning setof records |
Date: | 2006-01-20 17:07:07 |
Message-ID: | 25010.1137776827@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
"Scott Schulthess" <scott(at)topozone(dot)com> writes:
> :( I realize it often automatically converts, and I've tried using
> varchar and char for the state column, as well as int4, integer, and int
> for the other columns.
[ looks again... ] Oh, wait, you're getting caught by a standard
plpgsql gotcha:
> create function placenamesearch(place text, state integer, county text,
^^^^^
> FOR myview IN SELECT featurename, countyname, state, featuretype,
^^^^^
plpgsql variable names win out over table column names, so what's coming
back in the SELECT result's third column is the integer "state"
parameter.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-01-20 17:39:50 | Re: [Slony1-general] "Blueprints for High Availability" |
Previous Message | Scott Schulthess | 2006-01-20 16:43:24 | Re: Returning setof records |