| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add primary keys to system catalogs |
| Date: | 2021-02-02 10:37:14 |
| Message-ID: | 24c75543-8638-5fb5-9f13-0dc06e137e10@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-02-01 15:24, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 2021-01-30 22:56, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Hmm, shouldn't there have been a catversion bump in there?
>
>> I suppose yes on the grounds that it introduces something new in a
>> freshly initdb-ed database. But I thought it wasn't necessary because
>> there is no dependency between the binaries and the on-disk state.
>
> I've generally worked on the theory that a catversion bump is indicated
> if you need to initdb in order to pass the updated regression tests.
> Which one did in this case.
Yeah, that's a good way of looking at it. I'll keep that in mind.
--
Peter Eisentraut
2ndQuadrant, an EDB company
https://www.2ndquadrant.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-02-02 10:49:32 | Re: Add primary keys to system catalogs |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-02-02 10:35:49 | Improve new hash partition bound check error messages |