Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>, wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits
Date: 2024-11-11 23:31:40
Message-ID: 24b3deb6-a732-4256-847a-560f4bf39d59@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08/11/2024 20:10, Maxim Orlov wrote:
> Sorry for a late reply. There was a problem in upgrade with offset
> wraparound. Here is a fixed version. Test also added. I decide to use my
> old patch to set a non-standard multixacts for the old cluster, fill it
> with data and do pg_upgrade.

The wraparound logic is still not correct. To test, I created a cluster
where multixids have wrapped around, so that:

$ ls -l data-old/pg_multixact/offsets/
total 720
-rw------- 1 heikki heikki 212992 Nov 12 01:11 0000
-rw-r--r-- 1 heikki heikki 262144 Nov 12 00:55 FFFE
-rw------- 1 heikki heikki 262144 Nov 12 00:56 FFFF

After running pg_upgrade:

$ ls -l data-new/pg_multixact/offsets/
total 1184
-rw------- 1 heikki heikki 155648 Nov 12 01:12 0001
-rw------- 1 heikki heikki 262144 Nov 12 01:11 1FFFD
-rw------- 1 heikki heikki 262144 Nov 12 01:11 1FFFE
-rw------- 1 heikki heikki 262144 Nov 12 01:11 1FFFF
-rw------- 1 heikki heikki 262144 Nov 12 01:11 20000
-rw------- 1 heikki heikki 155648 Nov 12 01:11 20001

That's not right. The segments 20000 and 20001 were created by the new
pg_upgrade conversion code from old segment '0000'. But multixids are
still 32-bit values, so after segment 1FFFF, you should still wrap
around to 0000. The new segments should be '0000' and '0001'. The
segment '0001' is created when postgres is started after upgrade, but
it's created from scratch and doesn't contain the upgraded values.

When I try to select from a table after upgrade that contains
post-wraparound multixids:

TRAP: failed Assert("offset != 0"), File:
"../src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c", Line: 1353, PID: 63386

On a different note, I'm surprised you're rewriting member segments from
scratch, parsing all the individual member groups and writing them out
again. There's no change to the members file format, except for the
numbering of the files, so you could just copy the files under the new
names without paying attention to the contents. It's not wrong to parse
them in detail, but I'd assume that it would be simpler not to.

> Here is how to test. All the patches are for 14e87ffa5c543b5f3 master
> branch.
> 1) Get the 14e87ffa5c543b5f3 master branch apply patches 0001-Add-
> initdb-option-to-initialize-cluster-with-non-sta.patch and 0002-TEST-
> lower-SLRU_PAGES_PER_SEGMENT.patch
> 2) Get the 14e87ffa5c543b5f3 master branch in a separate directory and
> apply v6 patch set.
> 3) Build two branches.
> 4) Use ENV oldinstall to run the test: PROVE_TESTS=t/005_mxidoff.pl
> <http://005_mxidoff.pl> oldinstall=/home/orlov/proj/pgsql-new
> PG_TEST_NOCLEAN=1 make check -C src/bin/pg_upgrade/
>
> Maybe, I'll make a shell script to automate this steps if required.

Yeah, I think we need something to automate this. I did the testing
manually. I used the attached python script to consume multixids faster,
but it's still tedious.

I used pg_resetwal to quickly create a cluster that's close to multixid
wrapround:

initdb -D data
pg_resetwal -D data -m 4294900001,4294900000
dd if=/dev/zero of=data/pg_multixact/offsets/FFFE bs=8192 count=32

--
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)

Attachment Content-Type Size
multixids.py text/x-python 1.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Guo 2024-11-12 00:27:24 Re: Eager aggregation, take 3
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2024-11-11 23:24:24 Re: logical replication: restart_lsn can go backwards (and more), seems broken since 9.4