Bogus bounces from paul@paulweiss.info

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Bogus bounces from paul@paulweiss.info
Date: 2020-01-06 06:34:32
Message-ID: 2499.1578292472@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

The last few emails I've sent to pgsql-bugs have drawn error responses
like the attached. I believe that in the past, we've treated broken
servers that send complaints to the original poster and not the mailing
list server to be sufficient grounds for immediate de-subscription.

regards, tom lane

------- Forwarded Message

Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 06:21:46 +0000
From: <postmaster(at)outlook(dot)com>
To: <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Undeliverable: Re: BUG #16190: The usage of NULL pointer in refint.c

--d3dcb57a-c66a-4e4a-9904-ae603194af4c
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; differences=Content-Type;
boundary="c73c3012-9f53-4b6a-8095-2db6131b2112"

--c73c3012-9f53-4b6a-8095-2db6131b2112
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

p3plibsmtp01-10.prod.phx3.secureserver.net rejected your message to the fol=
lowing email addresses:

paul(at)paulweiss(dot)info<mailto:paul(at)paulweiss(dot)info>
The address you sent your message to wasn't found at the destination domain=
. It might be misspelled or it might not exist. Try to fix the problem by d=
oing one or more of the following:

1. Send the message again, but before you do, delete and retype the addr=
ess. If your email program automatically suggests an address to use, don't =
select it.
2. Clear the recipient AutoComplete cache in your email program by follo=
wing the steps in this article: Status code 5.1.1<https://go.microsoft.com/=
fwlink/?LinkId=3D389363>. Then resend the message, but before you do, be su=
re to delete and retype the address.
3. Contact the recipient by some other means (by phone, for example) to =
confirm you're using the right address. Ask them if they've set up an email=
forwarding rule that could be forwarding your message to an incorrect addr=
ess.

p3plibsmtp01-10.prod.phx3.secureserver.net gave this error:
104.47.70.103 is not allowed to send from <sss.pgh.pa.us> per its SPF Recor=
d. Please inspect your SPF settings, and try again. IB508 <http://x.co/srbo=
unce>

Diagnostic information for administrators:

Generating server: BN7NAM10HT147.mail.protection.outlook.com

paul(at)paulweiss(dot)info
p3plibsmtp01-10.prod.phx3.secureserver.net
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.1 104.47.70.103 is not allowed to send from=
<sss.pgh.pa.us> per its SPF Record. Please inspect your SPF settings, and =
try again. IB508 <http://x.co/srbounce>'

Original message headers:

Received: from BN7NAM10FT003.eop-nam10.prod.protection.outlook.com
(10.13.156.60) by BN7NAM10HT147.eop-nam10.prod.protection.outlook.com
(10.13.156.187) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=3DTLS1_2,
cipher=3DTLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2602.11; Mon, 6 J=
an
2020 06:21:45 +0000
Received: from MWHPR15MB1839.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (10.13.156.55) by
BN7NAM10FT003.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.157.141) with Microsoft S=
MTP
Server (version=3DTLS1_2, cipher=3DTLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) =
id
15.20.2602.11 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 06:21:45 +0000
X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:4A7614DD8E67CB7904A11B346EBB8FF=
3EFF9634EA39A6BCA96DC281434BE856C;UpperCasedChecksum:BE5A4C3C81B955BA2FEC61=
20F0AA86076D247F5D610BF10D82F96B7454B8819F;SizeAsReceived:16748;Count:126
Resent-From: <libcub(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Received: from MWHPR15MB1839.namprd15.prod.outlook.com ([::1]) by
MWHPR15MB1839.namprd15.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6c84:ae5c:f808:75ad%12]) w=
ith
Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.20.2602.015; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 06:21:44 +0000
Authentication-Results: spf=3Dpass (sender IP is 217.196.149.56)
smtp.mailfrom=3Dlists.postgresql.org; hotmail.com; dkim=3Dnone (message no=
t
signed) header.d=3Dnone;hotmail.com; dmarc=3Dnone action=3Dnone
header.from=3Dsss.pgh.pa.us;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of lists.postgresql.org
designates 217.196.149.56 as permitted sender)
receiver=3Dprotection.outlook.com; client-ip=3D217.196.149.56;
helo=3Dmalur.postgresql.org;
X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:F8403C58FEC96A2132E9E2CC749EB3A=
31D5616214C3B36CB9C37F018860D5292;UpperCasedChecksum:E3BCD830DA155AF852C467=
0867D91AB2D2238B25B340A2FCEB97E6557151902B;SizeAsReceived:2137;Count:25
From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
CC: starbugs(at)qq(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #16190: The usage of NULL pointer in refint.c
In-Reply-To: <20200106051800(dot)GL3598(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
References: <16190-70181c803641c3dc(at)postgresql(dot)org> <20200106051800(dot)GL3598(at)=
paquier.xyz>
Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
message dated "Mon, 06 Jan 2020 14:18:00 +0900"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"UTF-8"
Content-ID: <1233(dot)1578291695(dot)1(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 01:21:35 -0500
Message-ID: <1234(dot)1578291695(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
List-Id: <pgsql-bugs.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-bugs>
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/unsub/37/526829306c213811bb=
c373281d7fd3837dda19cf37b33924fce835cd0b2bbae7/>
X-IncomingHeaderCount: 25
Return-Path: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 1
X-EOPTenantAttributedMessage: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa:0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: EFV:NLI;
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: ea05ea28-90c7-4aa5-9489-08d79270b2=
b7
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: AM5EUR02HT073:|BN7NAM10HT147:
X-MS-Exchange-EOPDirect: true
X-Sender-IP: 217.196.149.56
X-SID-PRA: TGL(at)SSS(dot)PGH(dot)PA(dot)US
X-SID-Result: NONE
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:2;
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM5EUR02HT073
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-EndToEndLatency: 00:00:01.1052366
X-MS-Exchange-Processed-By-BccFoldering: 15.20.2602.010
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-Forked: True
X-MS-Exchange-Inbox-Rules-Loop: libcub(at)hotmail(dot)com
X-IncomingHeaderCount: 126
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStripped: BN7NAM10FT003.eop-nam10=
.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com

--c73c3012-9f53-4b6a-8095-2db6131b2112
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<Head></head><body>
<p><b><font color=3D"#000066" size=3D"3" face=3D"Arial">p3plibsmtp01-10.pro=
d.phx3.secureserver.net rejected your message to the following email addres=
ses:</font></b></p>
<font color=3D"#000000" size=3D"2" face=3D"Tahoma"><p><a href=3D"mailto:pau=
l(at)paulweiss(dot)info">paul(at)paulweiss(dot)info</a><br>
</font>
<font color=3D"#000000" size=3D"3" face=3D"Arial">The address you sent your=
message to wasn't found at the destination domain. It might be misspelled =
or it might not exist. Try to fix the problem by doing one or more of the f=
ollowing:<ol><li>Send the message again, but before you do, delete and rety=
pe the address. If your email program automatically suggests an address to =
use, don't select it.</li><li>Clear the recipient AutoComplete cache in you=
r email program by following the steps in this article: <a href=3D"https://=
go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=3D389363">Status code 5.1.1</a>. Then resen=
d the message, but before you do, be sure to delete and retype the address.=
</li><li>Contact the recipient by some other means (by phone, for example) =
to confirm you're using the right address. Ask them if they've set up an em=
ail forwarding rule that could be forwarding your message to an incorrect a=
ddress.</li></ol><br>
</font>
<font color=3D"#000000" size=3D"2" face=3D"Tahoma"><br>

<p><b>p3plibsmtp01-10.prod.phx3.secureserver.net gave this error:<br>
104.47.70.103 is not allowed to send from &lt;sss.pgh.pa.us&gt; per its SPF=
Record. Please inspect your SPF settings, and try again. IB508 &lt;http://=
x.co/srbounce&gt; <br>
</b></p>
</p>
</font>
<br><br><br><br><br><br>
<font color=3D"#808080" size=3D"2" face=3D"Tahoma"><p><b>Diagnostic informa=
tion for administrators:</b></p>
<p>Generating server: BN7NAM10HT147.mail.protection.outlook.com<br>
</p>
<p>paul(at)paulweiss(dot)info<br>
p3plibsmtp01-10.prod.phx3.secureserver.net<br>
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.1 104.47.70.103 is not allowed to send fro=
m &lt;sss.pgh.pa.us&gt; per its SPF Record. Please inspect your SPF setting=
s, and try again. IB508 &lt;http://x.co/srbounce&gt;'<br>
</p>
<p>Original message headers:</p>
<pre>Received: from BN7NAM10FT003.eop-nam10.prod.protection.outlook.com
(10.13.156.60) by BN7NAM10HT147.eop-nam10.prod.protection.outlook.com
(10.13.156.187) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=3DTLS1_2,
cipher=3DTLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2602.11; Mon, 6 J=
an
2020 06:21:45 +0000
Received: from MWHPR15MB1839.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (10.13.156.55) by
BN7NAM10FT003.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.157.141) with Microsoft S=
MTP
Server (version=3DTLS1_2, cipher=3DTLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) =
id
15.20.2602.11 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 06:21:45 +0000
X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:4A7614DD8E67CB7904A11B346EBB8FF=
3EFF9634EA39A6BCA96DC281434BE856C;UpperCasedChecksum:BE5A4C3C81B955BA2FEC61=
20F0AA86076D247F5D610BF10D82F96B7454B8819F;SizeAsReceived:16748;Count:126
Resent-From: &lt;libcub(at)hotmail(dot)com&gt;
Received: from MWHPR15MB1839.namprd15.prod.outlook.com ([::1]) by
MWHPR15MB1839.namprd15.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6c84:ae5c:f808:75ad%12]) w=
ith
Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.20.2602.015; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 06:21:44 +0000
Authentication-Results: spf=3Dpass (sender IP is 217.196.149.56)
smtp.mailfrom=3Dlists.postgresql.org; hotmail.com; dkim=3Dnone (message no=
t
signed) header.d=3Dnone;hotmail.com; dmarc=3Dnone action=3Dnone
header.from=3Dsss.pgh.pa.us;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of lists.postgresql.org
designates 217.196.149.56 as permitted sender)
receiver=3Dprotection.outlook.com; client-ip=3D217.196.149.56;
helo=3Dmalur.postgresql.org;
X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:F8403C58FEC96A2132E9E2CC749EB3A=
31D5616214C3B36CB9C37F018860D5292;UpperCasedChecksum:E3BCD830DA155AF852C467=
0867D91AB2D2238B25B340A2FCEB97E6557151902B;SizeAsReceived:2137;Count:25
From: Tom Lane &lt;tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us&gt;
To: Michael Paquier &lt;michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz&gt;
CC: starbugs(at)qq(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #16190: The usage of NULL pointer in refint.c
In-Reply-To: &lt;20200106051800(dot)GL3598(at)paquier(dot)xyz&gt;
References: &lt;16190-70181c803641c3dc(at)postgresql(dot)org&gt; &lt;2020010605180=
0(dot)GL3598(at)paquier(dot)xyz&gt;
Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier &lt;michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz&gt;
message dated &quot;Mon, 06 Jan 2020 14:18:00 +0900&quot;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D&quot;UTF-8&quot;
Content-ID: &lt;1233(dot)1578291695(dot)1(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us&gt;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 01:21:35 -0500
Message-ID: &lt;1234(dot)1578291695(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us&gt;
List-Id: &lt;pgsql-bugs.lists.postgresql.org&gt;
List-Help: &lt;https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/&gt;
List-Subscribe: &lt;https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/&gt;
List-Post: &lt;mailto:pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org&gt;
List-Owner: &lt;mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org&gt;
List-Archive: &lt;https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-bugs&gt;
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: &lt;https://lists.postgresql.org/unsub/37/526829306c21381=
1bbc373281d7fd3837dda19cf37b33924fce835cd0b2bbae7/&gt;
X-IncomingHeaderCount: 25
Return-Path: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 1
X-EOPTenantAttributedMessage: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa:0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: EFV:NLI;
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: ea05ea28-90c7-4aa5-9489-08d79270b2=
b7
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: AM5EUR02HT073:|BN7NAM10HT147:
X-MS-Exchange-EOPDirect: true
X-Sender-IP: 217.196.149.56
X-SID-PRA: TGL(at)SSS(dot)PGH(dot)PA(dot)US
X-SID-Result: NONE
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:2;
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM5EUR02HT073
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-EndToEndLatency: 00:00:01.1052366
X-MS-Exchange-Processed-By-BccFoldering: 15.20.2602.010
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-Forked: True
X-MS-Exchange-Inbox-Rules-Loop: libcub(at)hotmail(dot)com
X-IncomingHeaderCount: 126
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStripped: BN7NAM10FT003.eop-nam10=
.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
</pre>
</font>
</body>
</html>=

--c73c3012-9f53-4b6a-8095-2db6131b2112--

--d3dcb57a-c66a-4e4a-9904-ae603194af4c
Content-Type: message/delivery-status

Reporting-MTA: dns;BN7NAM10HT147.mail.protection.outlook.com
Received-From-MTA: dns;MWHPR15MB1839.namprd15.prod.outlook.com
Arrival-Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 06:21:45 +0000

Final-Recipient: rfc822;paul(at)paulweiss(dot)info
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.1 104.47.70.103 is not allowed to send from <sss.pgh.pa.us> per its SPF Record. Please inspect your SPF settings, and try again. IB508 <http://x.co/srbounce>
Remote-MTA: dns;p3plibsmtp01-10.prod.phx3.secureserver.net

--d3dcb57a-c66a-4e4a-9904-ae603194af4c
Content-Type: message/rfc822

Received: from BN7NAM10FT003.eop-nam10.prod.protection.outlook.com
(10.13.156.60) by BN7NAM10HT147.eop-nam10.prod.protection.outlook.com
(10.13.156.187) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2602.11; Mon, 6 Jan
2020 06:21:45 +0000
Received: from MWHPR15MB1839.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (10.13.156.55) by
BN7NAM10FT003.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.157.141) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
15.20.2602.11 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 06:21:45 +0000
X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:4A7614DD8E67CB7904A11B346EBB8FF3EFF9634EA39A6BCA96DC281434BE856C;UpperCasedChecksum:BE5A4C3C81B955BA2FEC6120F0AA86076D247F5D610BF10D82F96B7454B8819F;SizeAsReceived:16748;Count:126
Resent-From: <libcub(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Received: from MWHPR15MB1839.namprd15.prod.outlook.com ([::1]) by
MWHPR15MB1839.namprd15.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6c84:ae5c:f808:75ad%12]) with
Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.20.2602.015; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 06:21:44 +0000
Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 217.196.149.56)
smtp.mailfrom=lists.postgresql.org; hotmail.com; dkim=none (message not
signed) header.d=none;hotmail.com; dmarc=none action=none
header.from=sss.pgh.pa.us;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of lists.postgresql.org
designates 217.196.149.56 as permitted sender)
receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=217.196.149.56;
helo=malur.postgresql.org;
X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:F8403C58FEC96A2132E9E2CC749EB3A31D5616214C3B36CB9C37F018860D5292;UpperCasedChecksum:E3BCD830DA155AF852C4670867D91AB2D2238B25B340A2FCEB97E6557151902B;SizeAsReceived:2137;Count:25
From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
CC: starbugs(at)qq(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #16190: The usage of NULL pointer in refint.c
In-Reply-To: <20200106051800(dot)GL3598(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
References: <16190-70181c803641c3dc(at)postgresql(dot)org> <20200106051800(dot)GL3598(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
message dated "Mon, 06 Jan 2020 14:18:00 +0900"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-ID: <1233(dot)1578291695(dot)1(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 01:21:35 -0500
Message-ID: <1234(dot)1578291695(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
List-Id: <pgsql-bugs.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-bugs>
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/unsub/37/526829306c213811bbc373281d7fd3837dda19cf37b33924fce835cd0b2bbae7/>
X-IncomingHeaderCount: 25
Return-Path: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 1
X-EOPTenantAttributedMessage: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa:0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: EFV:NLI;
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: ea05ea28-90c7-4aa5-9489-08d79270b2b7
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: AM5EUR02HT073:|BN7NAM10HT147:
X-MS-Exchange-EOPDirect: true
X-Sender-IP: 217.196.149.56
X-SID-PRA: TGL(at)SSS(dot)PGH(dot)PA(dot)US
X-SID-Result: NONE
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:2;
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM5EUR02HT073
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-EndToEndLatency: 00:00:01.1052366
X-MS-Exchange-Processed-By-BccFoldering: 15.20.2602.010
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-Forked: True
X-MS-Exchange-Inbox-Rules-Loop: libcub(at)hotmail(dot)com
X-IncomingHeaderCount: 126
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStripped: BN7NAM10FT003.eop-nam10.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 03:39:36AM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
>> We checked the code in file =E2=80=9Crefint.c=E2=80=9D and there is one=
error occurring in
>> line 636.

> It could be better to switch all that to not use directly system
> calls, and rely properly on a high-level memory context with
> palloc-like allocations.

Yeah, if somebody wanted to fix this, the right way is to replace
these malloc calls with pallocs. Some investigation would be needed
about which context to use.

> ... There could be also an argument to just
> remove the module per the lack of attention it is getting, though it
> is still useful as an example of use for SPI, and the docs mention
> it for that.

The regression tests use refint too. Still, it's not production-grade
code by any means, and I'm not sure if there's much point in making
it so. I won't stand in the way if somebody else wants to ;-)

regards, tom lane

--d3dcb57a-c66a-4e4a-9904-ae603194af4c--

------- End of Forwarded Message

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2020-01-06 13:01:01 Re: Bogus bounces from paul@paulweiss.info
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2020-01-01 18:34:44 Re: "Resend email" gave me a "does not exist" message