From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: contrib loose ends: 9.0 to 9.1 incompatibilities |
Date: | 2011-02-16 22:03:38 |
Message-ID: | 24940.1297893818@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Well, actually, we *do* have such a mechanism (plpgsql), we just don't
>> want to use it unless we have to. I wouldn't feel too bad about saying
>> "upgrading tsearch2 directly from 9.0 to 9.4 requires that you have
>> plpgsql installed when you issue the CREATE EXTENSION command".
> We will then need "build"-time requires (build-depends would say debian)
> so that the system knows what's needed to run the install or upgrade
> scripts.
Huh? It's still an install-time dependency, and anyway the failure
would be pretty obvious. Please let us not spend time garnishing this
facility with unnecessary stuff, when the list of actually *important*
missing stuff is still a mile long. Think about what's needed to
support procedural languages as extensions, for starters. I'll give you
a hint: none of it has anything whatever to do with copying features
from RPM or Debian.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rémi Zara | 2011-02-16 22:06:23 | Re: pika failing since the per-column collation patch |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-16 21:33:40 | Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof) |