| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Max Vaschenko <max(at)nino(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: postmaster grows |
| Date: | 2001-02-06 15:37:37 |
| Message-ID: | 24933.981473857@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Max Vaschenko <max(at)nino(dot)ru> writes:
> After some (2-3 weeks) time both postmaster and all (every) backends take
> about 60mb memory.
Okay, then it is a postmaster leak. The backends are started by fork
from the postmaster, so they'd inherit whatever data memory size the
postmaster currently has.
> May be backend that running long time, causes other postgres processes
> to grow?
Not possible for a backend to affect the postmaster like that, AFAICS.
I think it's just a garden-variety memory leak in some postmaster
operation.
Since this isn't being reported by other folks, either there's a
system-specific problem or you are using a postmaster feature that's not
widely used. RedHat 6.2 is pretty common so we can probably eliminate
system-specific issues. Which authentication method(s) do you use?
(If you could send your whole pg_hba.conf file, that might be useful to
look at.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Max Vaschenko | 2001-02-06 15:58:54 | Re: postmaster grows |
| Previous Message | Max Vaschenko | 2001-02-06 14:25:19 | Re: postmaster grows |