Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error
Date: 1999-05-12 14:22:37
Message-ID: 24926.926518957@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) writes:
> I've just committed a little change to initdb and it's
> Makefile. The initdb Makefile now expands __DLSUFFIX__ into
> it and initdb uses $PGLIB/plpgsql__DLSUFFIX__ to test if it
> is there and then runs the appropriate queries against
> template1. Same for PL/Tcl.
> If anyone agrees we can get rid of these mklang.sql scripts
> totally.

Well, I hate to be a party-pooper, but I don't agree: I like having
the flexibility of installing plpgsql into just selected databases.
If it's automatically included into template1 then I no longer have
any choice in the matter.

Perhaps this could be driven by a configuration switch?

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-05-12 14:59:19 Re: [HACKERS] defalut value
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-05-12 14:19:09 Re: [HACKERS] Update Open Items list