Re: Spinlocks and semaphores in 9.2 and 9.3

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Spinlocks and semaphores in 9.2 and 9.3
Date: 2016-04-18 15:07:08
Message-ID: 24926.1460992028@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On April 16, 2016 6:02:39 PM PDT, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I went ahead and prepared and tested such a patch; the version for 9.3
>> is attached. (9.2 is identical modulo some pgindent-induced whitespace
>> difference.) This doesn't look too hazardous to me, so I'm thinking
>> we should apply it.

> I can't look at the patch just now, but the plan sounds good. Of you rather have somebody look art the patch before, I can do tomorrow morning.

Did you want to actually review this patch, or should I just push it?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksander Alekseev 2016-04-18 15:07:11 Should we remove unused code?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-04-18 15:04:10 Re: Refactor pg_dump as a library?