From: | Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PGSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Replication Monitoring |
Date: | 2007-12-07 09:30:59 |
Message-ID: | 249178.40657.qm@web25807.mail.ukl.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Ah thanks, thats what I must have done. Never happened on other lists
so I assumed it'd be okay. My Bad.
--- Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> Glyn Astill wrote:
> > How did that happen? The subject is totally different, so is the
> > body.
>
> It has an "In-Reply-To:" and possibly "References:" header which
> relates
> it to the other thread.
>
> The solution is simple. Don't reply to an existing message when
> you
> want to post a new thread. Compose a new one instead.
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera Developer,
> http://www.PostgreSQL.org/
> "Aprender sin pensar es inútil; pensar sin aprender, peligroso"
> (Confucio)
>
Glyn Astill
__________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! - the World's favourite mail http://uk.mail.yahoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sam Mason | 2007-12-07 11:46:27 | Re: aggregate and order by |
Previous Message | Henrik | 2007-12-07 09:17:34 | Re: Nested loop in simple query taking long time |