Re: Replication Monitoring

From: Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PGSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Replication Monitoring
Date: 2007-12-07 09:30:59
Message-ID: 249178.40657.qm@web25807.mail.ukl.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ah thanks, thats what I must have done. Never happened on other lists
so I assumed it'd be okay. My Bad.
--- Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:

> Glyn Astill wrote:
> > How did that happen? The subject is totally different, so is the
> > body.
>
> It has an "In-Reply-To:" and possibly "References:" header which
> relates
> it to the other thread.
>
> The solution is simple. Don't reply to an existing message when
> you
> want to post a new thread. Compose a new one instead.
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera Developer,
> http://www.PostgreSQL.org/
> "Aprender sin pensar es inútil; pensar sin aprender, peligroso"
> (Confucio)
>

Glyn Astill

__________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! - the World's favourite mail http://uk.mail.yahoo.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sam Mason 2007-12-07 11:46:27 Re: aggregate and order by
Previous Message Henrik 2007-12-07 09:17:34 Re: Nested loop in simple query taking long time