Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms
Date: 2009-08-04 15:39:04
Message-ID: 24911.1249400344@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On Tuesday 04 August 2009 17:56:41 Tom Lane wrote:
>> The other thing that I would say is a non-negotiable minimum requirement
>> is that the patch include the necessary configure pushups so it does not
>> break machines without uintptr_t.

> There is AC_TYPE_UINTPTR_T, so that should be easy.

It's certainly do-able, the point is just to do it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-08-04 15:44:27 Re: Alpha Releases: Docs?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-08-04 15:37:02 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Cause pg_proc.probin to be declared as text, not bytea.