From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Refactoring log_newpage |
Date: | 2012-02-02 16:04:46 |
Message-ID: | 24908.1328198686@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> wrote:
>> But we already had RelFileNode; wouldn't that be enough to tell what rmgr was responsible for the new page? Can 2 different rmgrs write to the same file node?
> No, but which one? No way to tell unless you have full list of
> relfilenodes and check each one. So btree changes look like heap
> changes etc..
What I'm not following is why we should care. There are no cases at
present where this matters, and no proposed patches (that I know of)
that would make it matter. If an individual rmgr needs control of
what happens during a given operation, it wouldn't use XLOG_NEWPAGE
to represent the operation. End of problem. You haven't provided
any convincing argument why this needs to be changed globally.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-02-02 16:27:19 | Re: heap_tuple_needs_freeze false positive |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-02-02 15:19:47 | Re: double writes using "double-write buffer" approach [WIP] |