Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch
Date: 2007-04-04 19:01:59
Message-ID: 24900.1175713319@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> I have two questions about the dependency system.

> 1. Is there a built-in defense to avoid circular dependencies?

It doesn't have a problem with them, if that's what you mean.

> 2. If I register dependencies between column, is there a way
> to retrieve all table/column type dependencies for a depender column?

You can scan pg_depend.

> What I would like to achieve is to lift the limit that
> a GENERATED column cannot reference another one.

I would counsel not doing that, mainly because then you will have to
solve an evaluation-order problem at runtime.

> Point taken. So, just like with SET / DROP IDENTITY,
> I should implement SET GENERATED ALWAYS
> and DROP GENERATED.

If you think of it as a property of the default expression, then DROP
DEFAULT covers both cases, you don't need DROP GENERATED...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-04-04 19:10:01 Re: Auto Partitioning
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-04-04 19:01:45 Re: Auto Partitioning

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-04-04 19:10:01 Re: Auto Partitioning
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-04-04 19:01:45 Re: Auto Partitioning