From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch |
Date: | 2007-04-04 19:01:59 |
Message-ID: | 24900.1175713319@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> I have two questions about the dependency system.
> 1. Is there a built-in defense to avoid circular dependencies?
It doesn't have a problem with them, if that's what you mean.
> 2. If I register dependencies between column, is there a way
> to retrieve all table/column type dependencies for a depender column?
You can scan pg_depend.
> What I would like to achieve is to lift the limit that
> a GENERATED column cannot reference another one.
I would counsel not doing that, mainly because then you will have to
solve an evaluation-order problem at runtime.
> Point taken. So, just like with SET / DROP IDENTITY,
> I should implement SET GENERATED ALWAYS
> and DROP GENERATED.
If you think of it as a property of the default expression, then DROP
DEFAULT covers both cases, you don't need DROP GENERATED...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-04-04 19:10:01 | Re: Auto Partitioning |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-04-04 19:01:45 | Re: Auto Partitioning |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-04-04 19:10:01 | Re: Auto Partitioning |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-04-04 19:01:45 | Re: Auto Partitioning |