From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvar Freude <alvar(at)a-blast(dot)org> |
Cc: | Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, Markus Wollny <Markus(dot)Wollny(at)computec(dot)de>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Still problems with memory swapping and server load |
Date: | 2002-06-27 13:34:27 |
Message-ID: | 24894.1025184867@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Alvar Freude <alvar(at)a-blast(dot)org> writes:
> -- Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> wrote:
>> Some of your backends are getting pretty darn big. I wonder what
>> they're doing? It can't be sort memory at this point. But as you
>> can see, those five 200-250MB backends are killing you.
> no, not really: they use shared memory:
No, because all the backends will be accessing the *exact same* shared
memory; it's impossible for some to be using more than others. Since we
see process sizes ranging from 17M to 251M, it's a pretty safe bet that
the latter guys are actually chewing a lot of private space. I don't
know what the "share" column means in that ps display, but I wouldn't
trust it.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jorge Sarmiento | 2002-06-27 13:44:13 | Re: Strange behaviour of SELECT ... IN |
Previous Message | David Siebert | 2002-06-27 13:17:22 | Re: What is a tuple? |