Re: LOST REFERENTIAL INTEGRITY

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jimmie H(dot) Apsey" <japsey(at)futuredental(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: LOST REFERENTIAL INTEGRITY
Date: 2004-10-04 20:59:34
Message-ID: 2489.1096923574@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Jimmie H. Apsey" <japsey(at)futuredental(dot)com> writes:
>> Each FK constraint should have three associated triggers (two on the
>> referencing table, one on the referenced table).

> OH, that's very scary for me that triggers can vanish/be eliminated w/o
> my direct action. Yes, I do now see that the triggers on my production
> table have been lost. I built a test table and they appear as
> expected. Is there any way I can prevent this or become aware that
> something had done this to my production database?

If you are still running 7.1 you obviously do not know the meaning of
the word "fear" ;-) --- it not only has lots of since-fixed bugs, but
at that time we hadn't yet solved the transaction ID wraparound problem,
which means your DB is guaranteed to self-destruct once you reach the
4-billion-transaction mark.

I'd recommend an upgrade to 7.4.5 at your earliest convenience.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jimmie H. Apsey 2004-10-04 21:25:59 Re: LOST REFERENTIAL INTEGRITY
Previous Message Taber, Mark 2004-10-04 20:55:12 Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 install woes