From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | btober(at)seaworthysys(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Where are user-defined types stored/viewed |
Date: | 2003-09-29 15:51:18 |
Message-ID: | 24884.1064850678@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
<btober(at)seaworthysys(dot)com> writes:
> After I execute a command like
> CREATE TYPE employee_wage_journal_sum AS (supplier_pk integer,
> employee_pk integer,
> hourly_dollars double precision,
> annual_dollars double precision);
> I don't see the new type show up anywhere in pgAdminII.
Probably not. Stand-alone composite types (like the above) are a new
feature in 7.3, and pgAdminII likely doesn't know about them.
You might try pgAdmin III, which just got out of beta I believe.
> but I see only the name itself (and a lot of "*id" columns that probably
> reference something relevant), but I don't know how to get the actual
> definition back so that I can use an existing type definition as the
> basis for modification when application design changes are required.
There's always "pg_dump -s" to extract such stuff.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Doug McNaught | 2003-09-29 15:51:54 | Re: Modification Dates |
Previous Message | Achilleus Mantzios | 2003-09-29 15:46:44 | Conditional row grained + FK dependency oriented lazy replication |