From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal |
Date: | 2003-03-13 06:06:21 |
Message-ID: | 2487.1047535581@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Create an array support package on gborg if you like, but I feel this
>> should not be in the mainline.
> Arrays *do* have a place, and they are supported in SQL99+.
FWIW, I'm with Joe on this one. Arrays have their uses; and it's not
like there are no misusable constructs in SQL ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2003-03-13 06:29:19 | Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-13 05:37:58 | Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-03-13 16:50:32 | Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2003-03-13 05:34:33 | Re: [HACKERS] SQL99 ARRAY support proposal |