Are partitions getting pruned?

From: ROBERT KLAUS <rklaus0712(at)wowway(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Are partitions getting pruned?
Date: 2013-04-08 15:26:35
Message-ID: 248672940.608756.1365434795661.JavaMail.root@md06.wow.synacor.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Postgres 8.4.9 on CentOS

I partitioned some tables over the weekend by month using a date field as the partitioning column. Table inheritance was used and all indexes on the parent were created on the partitions. constraint_exclustion = partition.

My question is, are partitions really getting pruned or are locks showing up just due to inheritance.

When I run an explain of the query it shows partition pruning.

select * from voice.daily_nbr_list where item_date = '2013-03-17' and market = 'Chicago'

Result (cost=0.00..154563.67 rows=99468 width=210) (actual time=557.634..2174.804 rows=104042 loops=1)

-> Append (cost=0.00..154563.67 rows=99468 width=210) (actual time=557.631..2109.153 rows=104042 loops=1)

-> Seq Scan on daily_nbr_list (cost=0.00..15.10 rows=2 width=209) (actual time=0.000..0.000 rows=0 loops=1)

Filter: ((item_date = '2013-03-17'::date) AND ((market)::text = 'Chicago'::text))

-> Bitmap Heap Scan on daily_nbr_list _201303 daily_nbr_list (cost=2844.72..154548.57 rows=99466 width=210) (actual time=557.629..2098.579 rows=104042 loops=1)

Recheck Cond: (item_date = '2013-03-17'::date)

Filter: ((market)::text = 'Chicago'::text)

-> Bitmap Index Scan on daily_nbr_list_idx _201303 (cost=0.00..2819.86 rows=152412 width=0) (actual time=167.538..167.538 rows=153963 loops=1)

Index Cond: (item_date = '2013-03-17'::date)

Total runtime: 2181.130 ms

However, when I run the query and view the locks it’s using it shows all partitions having locks on them.

select * from voice.daily_nbr_list where item_date = '2013-03-17' and market = 'Chicago'; voice.daily_nbr_list; AccessShareLock

select * from voice.daily_nbr_list where item_date = '2013-03-17' and market = 'Chicago'; voice.daily_nbr_list_201206; AccessShareLock

select * from voice.daily_nbr_list where item_date = '2013-03-17' and market = 'Chicago'; voice.daily_nbr_list_201207; AccessShareLock

select * from voice.daily_nbr_list where item_date = '2013-03-17' and market = 'Chicago'; voice.daily_nbr_list_201208; AccessShareLock

select * from voice.daily_nbr_list where item_date = '2013-03-17' and market = 'Chicago'; voice.daily_nbr_list_201209; AccessShareLock

select * from voice.daily_nbr_list where item_date = '2013-03-17' and market = 'Chicago'; voice.daily_nbr_list_201210; AccessShareLock

select * from voice.daily_nbr_list where item_date = '2013-03-17' and market = 'Chicago'; voice.daily_nbr_list_201211; AccessShareLock

select * from voice.daily_nbr_list where item_date = '2013-03-17' and market = 'Chicago'; voice.daily_nbr_list_201212; AccessShareLock

select * from voice.daily_nbr_list where item_date = '2013-03-17' and market = 'Chicago'; voice.daily_nbr_list_201301; AccessShareLock

select * from voice.daily_nbr_list where item_date = '2013-03-17' and market = 'Chicago'; voice.daily_nbr_list_201302; AccessShareLock

select * from voice.daily_nbr_list where item_date = '2013-03-17' and market = 'Chicago'; voice.daily_nbr_list_201303; AccessShareLock

select * from voice.daily_nbr_list where item_date = '2013-03-17' and market = 'Chicago'; voice.daily_nbr_list_201304; AccessShareLock

select * from voice.daily_nbr_list where item_date = '2013-03-17' and market = 'Chicago'; voice.daily_nbr_list_201305; AccessShareLock

I noticed row exclusive locks being held on all partitions for procedure calls that update the data.

Thanks,
Robert

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniele Varrazzo 2013-04-08 15:28:03 Re: Selecting timestamp from Database
Previous Message Jared Beck 2013-04-08 15:24:42 Re: [Maintainers] REL/Centos4 release of 8.4.17?