| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniele Orlandi <daniele(at)orlandi(dot)com>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in LIKE ? |
| Date: | 1999-06-07 15:07:39 |
| Message-ID: | 24855.928768059@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> How about adding some regression test queries to catch this kind of
> thing? Looks like we don't have *anything* in this area at all except
> for tests in the multi-byte string handling, from Tatsuo.
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. I'll bet the MB tests don't catch
this bug either, because it's substantially less likely to get noticed
if USE_LOCALE is on...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vadim Mikheev | 1999-06-07 15:17:59 | Re: [HACKERS] new one |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-06-07 15:06:07 | Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser gram.y' |