Re: GRANT on functions/languages

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GRANT on functions/languages
Date: 2002-10-10 04:47:34
Message-ID: 24846.1034225254@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Now that we have relaxed the restriction on functions/languages, should
> we make sure we have GRANTS for all of them, including /contrib, or
> remove them all.

I feel no strong need to do anything. The contrib entries that have
explicit GRANTs are okay and pretty future-proof; but the ones that
don't have 'em are not broken. We have other problems to contend with
that deserve more attention than this one...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-10 04:56:04 Re: inline newNode()
Previous Message Joe Conway 2002-10-10 04:27:28 Re: inquiry about multi-row resultset in functions