| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: COPY (... tab completion |
| Date: | 2016-01-11 01:23:06 |
| Message-ID: | 24816.1452475386@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I think this would be a useful addition. A couple of problems:
> This change in the comment doesn't make sense to me and doesn't seem to
> match the code:
> - /* If we have COPY [BINARY] <sth>, complete it with "TO" or "FROM" */
> + /* If we have COPY|BINARY <sth>, complete it with "TO" or "FROM" */
Offhand, that looks like an accidental reversion of a change made in
9b181b0363deb65b15a9feaf3eb74f86707498a9.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-01-11 01:39:08 | Re: Improved tab completion for FDW DDL |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-01-11 01:19:13 | Re: COPY (... tab completion |