Re: pg_ctl vs. Windows locking

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl vs. Windows locking
Date: 2004-06-14 16:27:02
Message-ID: 2480.1087230422@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32

Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> Yes, killing (or rather closing the pipe to it) early is probably the
> right idea.

Right, we can just close the pipe. I was thinking of adding another
signal but that's obviously easier. Will work on making this happen.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-06-14 16:39:08 Re: pg_ctl vs. Windows locking
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2004-06-14 16:23:31 Re: pg_ctl vs. Windows locking