| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade 9.4 -> 9.5 with pg_trgm fails for me |
| Date: | 2016-01-08 21:26:25 |
| Message-ID: | 24792.1452288385@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 04:03:51PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW, the one-liner fix that I'd had in mind when I wrote that does indeed
>> fix this particular problem, but after studying the code I realized that
>> there's a whole bunch of related problems; for instance I believe
>> pg_upgrade would lose domain constraints on a domain type that's in an
>> extension installed into pg_catalog :-(.
> Does this warrant adding a few words to the documentation
> warning against installing extensions into pg_catalog. ?
No, it's just a bug. Although apparently not many people do that, or
we'd have heard complaints before.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2016-01-08 21:39:22 | Re: pg_upgrade 9.4 -> 9.5 with pg_trgm fails for me |
| Previous Message | Karsten Hilbert | 2016-01-08 21:06:10 | Re: pg_upgrade 9.4 -> 9.5 with pg_trgm fails for me |