From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: anole: assorted stability problems |
Date: | 2015-06-28 23:27:17 |
Message-ID: | 24791.1435534037@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>>>> Uh. I'm pretty sure there were some back when that patch went in. And
>>>> there definitely used to be a couple earlier. I guess itanium really is
>>>> dying (mixed bad: It's a horrible architecture, but more coverage would
>>>> still be good).
>>> Since that machine is run by EDB, maybe we could persuade them to set up
>>> a second critter on it that uses gcc. That would at least help narrow
>>> down whether it's a compiler-specific issue.
>> I pinged EDB about this several days ago, and they have now set up
>> buildfarm member gharial running on the same machine, using gcc.
> FWIW gharial does not show any problem whatsoever.
I'd hoped that commit 1b468a131bd260c9041484f78b8580c7f232d580 would
resolve this, but nope, anole is still getting occasional stuck spinlocks:
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=anole&dt=2015-06-28%2021%3A35%3A02
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-06-28 23:35:12 | Re: Solaris testers wanted for strxfrm() behavior |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-06-28 23:14:14 | Re: Solaris testers wanted for strxfrm() behavior |