Re: AW: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: AW: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
Date: 2001-03-16 15:52:01
Message-ID: 24769.984757921@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> tried test cases with both journaling and non-journaling file systems?
> Perhaps the flag choice would be markedly different for the different
> options?

Good point. Another reason we don't have enough data to nail this down
yet. Anyway, the code is in there and people can run test cases if they
please...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-03-16 15:55:53 Re: ["Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>] Re: O_DSYNC flag for open
Previous Message Ken Hirsch 2001-03-16 15:44:49 Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC