From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
Cc: | robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com (Robert Haas), Sergey Burladyan <eshkinkot(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #5234: ALTER TABLE ... RENAME COLUMN change view definition incorrectly |
Date: | 2009-12-10 16:57:40 |
Message-ID: | 24765.1260464260@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> There's another possible solution (albeit a somewhat nontrivial one)
> which came up when a bunch of us were talking about this one on IRC;
> which is to handle the problem in the view deparse: if a column used
> in a USING clause has been renamed, add an alias to the query that
> renames it back, e.g.
> select ... from table1 as table1(v,a) join ... using (v)
Hmm. Cute, but I wonder why we shouldn't just be throwing an error.
As I said last night, the only thing I see wrong with the current
behavior is that the error message isn't phrased in a way that makes
it obvious it's the user's fault.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-12-10 17:09:57 | Re: BUG #5234: ALTER TABLE ... RENAME COLUMN change view definition incorrectly |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-10 16:54:47 | Re: BUG #5234: ALTER TABLE ... RENAME COLUMN change view definition incorrectly |