From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
Cc: | Kevin Jacobs <jacobs(at)penguin(dot)theopalgroup(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] PlPython |
Date: | 2003-06-29 22:21:45 |
Message-ID: | 24757.1056925305@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> writes:
> The version with patch which removes RExec (as Python 2.x is not
> supporting it ) is the right thoing to do FOR PYTHON 2.X, but there is
> no reason to remove safe execution when using python 1.5.x.
Who's still using 1.5, I guess is the question? And are they likely
to be updating their PG installation when they're not updating Python?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-29 22:25:20 | Re: PG crash on simple query |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2003-06-29 21:38:33 | Re: [HACKERS] PlPython |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-29 22:29:18 | Re: Question about array read using protocol 3.0 implementation in C# |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2003-06-29 21:38:33 | Re: [HACKERS] PlPython |