Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 09:46:30AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Would it? How wide is the "user and token" information?
> Sorry about the waste of time. I just noticed that the proposal is
> only for rows over 128 bytes. The token definition is:
> CREATE TABLE dspam_token_data (
> uid smallint,
> token bigint,
> spam_hits int,
> innocent_hits int,
> last_hit date,
> );
> which is below the cutoff for the proposal.
Yeah, this illustrates my concern that the proposal is too narrowly
focused on a specific benchmark.
regards, tom lane