Re: BUG #18470: Time literal accepted in Postgres 15 and below, not accepted in Postgres 16

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: david(dot)perez(dot)ingeniero(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #18470: Time literal accepted in Postgres 15 and below, not accepted in Postgres 16
Date: 2024-05-17 18:01:51
Message-ID: 2473625.1715968911@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

I wrote:
> I'm not sure whether that wikipedia page should be taken
> as authoritative, but if we can convince ourselves that
> 'T14:00:00' really is a thing per 8601, then yeah we should
> undo that part.

Given the lack of ready availability of 8601 itself, perhaps
we should assume that everyone's going to believe wikipedia.
In any case, what it says is pretty straightforward:

As of ISO 8601-1:2019, the basic format is T[hh][mm][ss] and the
extended format is T[hh]:[mm]:[ss]. Earlier versions omitted the T
(representing time) in both formats.

Either the seconds, or the minutes and seconds, may be omitted
from the basic or extended time formats for greater brevity but
decreased precision; the resulting reduced precision time formats
are:

T[hh][mm] in basic format or T[hh]:[mm] in extended format, when
seconds are omitted.

T[hh], when both seconds and minutes are omitted.

We previously accepted all of these except T[hh]. I'm inclined
to continue to reject that, even if it's nominally standards
compliant, because it seems way too likely to be a mistake.

Interestingly, the code does still take the "basic" (colon-free)
forms:

regression=# select time 'T1347';
time
----------
13:47:00
(1 row)

regression=# select time 'T134712';
time
----------
13:47:12
(1 row)

regression=# select time 'T134712.4';
time
------------
13:47:12.4
(1 row)

So at this point, yeah that's a bug we should fix.
I'll look into it later if nobody beats me to it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-05-17 20:39:05 Re: BUG #18468: CREATE TABLE ... LIKE leaves orphaned column reference in extended statistics
Previous Message PG Bug reporting form 2024-05-17 15:35:58 BUG #18472: SELECT FOR UPDATE locking more rows than expected