From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) |
Date: | 2010-08-04 19:31:12 |
Message-ID: | 24716.1280950272@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Either way, I don't have strong feelings on this other than if we dont
> fix it now when will we?
Well, we won't. If 9.0 ships with both forms of string_agg, we're stuck
with it IMO. It's not exactly a bug, so I won't cry if that's how
things go; but it is striking that already two different people have
gotten confused enough to file bug reports because of this. If we don't
pull the one-argument form then I think we can look forward to many more
of those in future years.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thom Brown | 2010-08-04 19:32:58 | Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-04 19:28:07 | Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thom Brown | 2010-08-04 19:32:58 | Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-04 19:28:07 | Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) |