Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-02 20:15:32
Message-ID: 2470.1115064932@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>> Anyone willing to take ownership of it to setup the project itself on
>>> pgfoundry?
>>
>> I thought it was still maintained?

> Right, but it should be moved out of our CVS, I think.

Didn't someone offer a rewritten version of dbmirror just this morning?
Maybe that person could be persuaded to run a pgfoundry project.

dbmirror is certainly a fine example of something that doesn't need to
be in the core distro as far as maintenance is concerned. Of course,
it's also not large enough to make much of a difference in tarball size.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-05-02 20:20:30 Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-02 20:14:08 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-05-02 20:16:41 Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-02 20:14:08 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement