From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: "make install" now tries to build the documentation |
Date: | 2009-08-18 21:01:58 |
Message-ID: | 2469.1250629318@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On tis, 2009-08-18 at 15:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, having "make install" behave in a history-dependent fashion is just
>> as much a hazard for users as it is for developers.
> That's kind of a built-in feature of make. Otherwise we could write the
> build rules as shell scripts. ;-)
Well, no -- make is supposed to skip redundant build steps while
producing the specified outputs. It's not supposed to skip producing
the outputs.
> Anyway, a simple fix that doesn't upset too many things would be to
> remove the dependencies
> install-html: html
> install-man: man
That doesn't really make me feel more comfortable. It would
alleviate my immediate complaint, but also introduce the possibility of
accidentally installing obsolete docs. OTOH I suppose the probability
of an actual problem of that sort is low, and we've been living with
essentially equivalent install behavior for a long time.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-08-18 21:51:36 | Re: REGRESS_OPTS versus MSVC build scripts |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-08-18 20:17:23 | Re: "make install" now tries to build the documentation |