| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Hilbert, Sebastian" <Sebastian(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade ?deficiency |
| Date: | 2013-11-22 20:13:33 |
| Message-ID: | 24674.1385151213@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Not sure about backpatching. default_transaction_read_only has been
> around since 7.4. Setting it to true would cause pg_dump to fail unless
> you changed the database setting, and pg_dumpall would fail completely
> as there is no way to turn off the database setting.
No, neither pg_dump nor pg_dumpall would fail. What would fail is
restoring into a database that has this option already set. It's possible
that users of this option haven't noticed it because they never attempted
a restore in such a context.
> The problem is that I don't remember any report of this failing in
> pg_dump, pg_dumpall, or pg_upgrade, so saying it is a major issue is
> hard to accept.
Yeah, it's a minor issue at best, but perhaps worth fixing since
the solution is so easy.
The bigger picture here is that there are lots of ways to break
pg_upgrade via not-sane settings, and there always will be.
I don't think we should try to promise that there won't be.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-11-22 20:14:03 | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-11-22 19:54:06 | Re: corruption issue after server crash - ERROR: unexpected chunk number 0 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-11-22 20:14:03 | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-11-22 20:06:24 | Re: Building on S390 |