From: | houssem jemel <houssem20(at)yahoo(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re : Re : Dependence between jobs |
Date: | 2009-01-08 14:56:07 |
Message-ID: | 246475.83082.qm@web25213.mail.ukl.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support |
Why can we not use the parameter of the step "succed" "failed" in the pgadmin in order to inject it to another step or another job
----- Message d'origine ----
De : Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
À : houssem jemel <houssem20(at)yahoo(dot)fr>
Cc : pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org
Envoyé le : Jeudi, 8 Janvier 2009, 14h58mn 51s
Objet : Re: Re : [pgadmin-support] Dependence between jobs
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:50 PM, houssem jemel <houssem20(at)yahoo(dot)fr> wrote:
> In that case we can not create e rule between two scripts on 2 different machines, since the job is assignet to one machine
> Is there a solution to that ?
No. You could potentially use some creative scripting and scp/ssh to
have one machine write the success or failure of a job to a location
that the other can inspect.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-01-08 15:00:49 | Re: Re : Re : Dependence between jobs |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-01-08 13:58:51 | Re: Re : Dependence between jobs |