From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Madison Kelly <linux(at)alteeve(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tobias Brox <tobias(at)nordicbet(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Index ot being used |
Date: | 2005-06-12 15:56:23 |
Message-ID: | 24636.1118591783@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Madison Kelly <linux(at)alteeve(dot)com> writes:
> Here is my full query:
> tle-bu=> EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT file_name, file_parent_dir, file_type
> FROM file_info_7 WHERE file_type='d' ORDER BY file_parent_dir ASC,
> file_name ASC;
> This is my index (which I guess is wrong):
> tle-bu=> \d file_info_7_display_idx
> Index "public.file_info_7_display_idx"
> Column | Type
> -----------------+----------------------
> file_type | character varying(2)
> file_parent_dir | text
> file_name | text
> btree, for table "public.file_info_7"
The index is fine, but you need to phrase the query as
... ORDER BY file_type, file_parent_dir, file_name;
(Whether you use ASC or not doesn't matter.) Otherwise the planner
won't make the connection to the sort ordering of the index.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2005-06-12 17:37:32 | Re: Index ot being used |
Previous Message | Madison Kelly | 2005-06-12 14:12:27 | Re: Index ot being used |