Re: bug in pg_dump ALTER DATABASE

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug in pg_dump ALTER DATABASE
Date: 2004-06-29 06:11:38
Message-ID: 24623.1088489498@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Is a fix for this required for only search_path, or is it a more general
> problem?

I think this has to be driven off the GUC_LIST_INPUT and/or
GUC_LIST_QUOTE flag bits (too late at night to remember just what those
two flags do, but one or both determines this). One small problem is
that pg_dump can't see the GUC flag bits AFAIK ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-06-29 06:27:24 Re: client_min_messages in dumps?
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-06-29 03:58:22 bug in pg_dump ALTER DATABASE