Re: Some belated patch review for "Buffers" explain analyze patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: "<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Some belated patch review for "Buffers" explain analyze patch
Date: 2010-02-09 22:03:48
Message-ID: 24620.1265753028@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> I already have a patch to do this but it's a bit grotty -- do we want
> to have a generic format string in snprintf in case we need it
> somewhere else other than explain.c?

No. Custom format specifiers that take arguments will confuse the heck
out of gcc's format-checking warnings. There is no way that saving
a bit of ugliness is worth that. Just do format_memory_amount(foo)
and print it with %s.

> Secondly, I think it's printing the total buffer usage for that node
> across the whole query -- not the average per iteration. I agree that
> the average is probably more confusing but it's what we do for every
> other stat. Do we want to be consistent?

Probably yes. But it strikes me that the additional numbers printed for
Sort nodes might be bogus in multiple-loop cases too; what about that?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2010-02-09 22:05:55 Re: ERROR: could not load library "...": Exec format error
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-02-09 21:54:44 Re: Some belated patch review for "Buffers" explain analyze patch