Re: recent failures on lorikeet

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: recent failures on lorikeet
Date: 2021-06-14 17:29:41
Message-ID: 246175.1623691781@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> What that'd have to imply is that get_ps_display() messed up,
> returning a bad pointer or a bad length.
> A platform-specific problem in get_ps_display() seems plausible
> enough. The apparent connection to a concurrent VACUUM FULL seems
> pretty hard to explain that way ... but maybe that's a mirage.

If I understand correctly that you're only seeing this in v13 and
HEAD, then it seems like bf68b79e5 (Refactor ps_status.c API)
deserves a hard look.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2021-06-14 17:29:42 Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-06-14 17:18:43 Re: recent failures on lorikeet