Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Establish conventions about global object names used in regressi

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Establish conventions about global object names used in regressi
Date: 2019-09-22 06:36:16
Message-ID: 24616.1569134176@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 11:02 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
>> It's reliable. Doesn't have to be a Valgrind build, or even a debug build.

> I can also confirm that the problem can't have anything to do with the
> patch that I happened to be testing -- the master branch is also
> affected.

Hm. So ... how come the buildfarm hasn't been red for the last three
years? We need to figure out what you're doing that's different.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-09-22 06:45:34 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Establish conventions about global object names used in regressi
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-09-22 06:06:07 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Establish conventions about global object names used in regressi