Re: Slashdot discussion

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Howie <caffeine(at)toodarkpark(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Slashdot discussion
Date: 2000-07-12 19:28:40
Message-ID: 24614.963430120@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Howie <caffeine(at)toodarkpark(dot)org> writes:
> Who would I talk to about (partially) funding these, btw? or is that no
> longer a concern with Great Bridge ?

Great Bridge isn't actually up-and-running yet, AFAICT, so PostgreSQL
Inc would be the only likely place to funnel cash into a near-term
development project. (Or you could maybe make a personal agreement
with some key developer, but in the current state of affairs that's
difficult because we all have other full-time jobs...)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gilles DAROLD 2000-07-12 19:29:17 Re: Are there limits to number of INSERTS inside a Transaction?
Previous Message Howie 2000-07-12 19:15:42 Re: Enterprise Java Beans support?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2000-07-12 19:42:24 Re: Slashdot discussion
Previous Message Howie 2000-07-12 19:14:48 Re: Slashdot discussion