Re: Partitioning and performance

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ravi Krishna <sravikrishna3(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jan Lentfer <Jan(dot)Lentfer(at)web(dot)de>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Partitioning and performance
Date: 2015-05-28 17:13:10
Message-ID: 24609.1432833190@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ravi Krishna <sravikrishna3(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Is there a rule of thumb as to at what size does the partitioning
> start performing better than non partitioned table.

Personally I'd not worry about partitioning until I had a table
approaching maybe a billion (1e9) rows. You could argue that
an order of magnitude either way, but it's just not worth the
extra complexity for data volumes very much less than that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2015-05-28 17:21:25 Re: WAL Streaming Failure PostgreSQL 9.4
Previous Message Ravi Krishna 2015-05-28 17:12:20 Re: Partitioning and performance