Re: Our "fallback" atomics implementation doesn't actually work

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Our "fallback" atomics implementation doesn't actually work
Date: 2016-10-05 19:02:09
Message-ID: 24585.1475694129@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> Without yet having analyzed this deeply, could it actually be that the
> reason is that sem_post/wait aren't proper memory barriers? On a glance
> the symptoms look like values have been modified without proper locks...

Hmm, possible ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2016-10-05 19:43:43 Re: Kernel Tainted
Previous Message Serge Rielau 2016-10-05 18:58:33 Fast AT ADD COLUMN with DEFAULTs