Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
Cc: "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org '" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape
Date: 2000-01-16 20:47:11
Message-ID: 24568.948055631@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> writes:
> Can I go ahead and use today's snapshot to write up the diffs for
> pg_dump for dumping COMMENT ON statements?

Sure --- just don't test it with any long comments ;-)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-01-16 21:32:38 Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST
Previous Message Mike Mascari 2000-01-16 20:30:21 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape