Re: SendRowDescriptionMessage() is slow for queries with a lot of columns

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SendRowDescriptionMessage() is slow for queries with a lot of columns
Date: 2017-09-28 04:01:53
Message-ID: 2456.1506571313@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> Attached is an extension of the already existing pg_bswap.h that
> a) adds 16 bit support
> b) moves everything to inline functions, removing multiple evaluation
> hazards that were present everywhere.
> c) adds pg_nto{s,l,ll} and pg_hton{s,l,ll} wrappers that only do work
> if necessary.

Could we please not perpetuate the brain-dead "s" and "l" suffixes
on these names? Given the lack of standardization as to how long
"long" is, that's entirely unhelpful. I'd be fine with names like
pg_ntoh16/32/64 and pg_hton16/32/64.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-09-28 04:06:49 Re: SendRowDescriptionMessage() is slow for queries with a lot of columns
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-09-28 03:15:20 Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers