Re: cvs build failure

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de>, Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: cvs build failure
Date: 2003-07-02 04:45:02
Message-ID: 24530.1057121102@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> This would turn off the make failure when an old bison is called from
> the makefile?

Rephrase that as "this would give bison the right to fail of its own
accord, rather than our prejudging its ability to cope."

Given bison's on-again-off-again track record in recent releases,
I don't think it's wise to wire in a non-overridable assumption
that bison < X is broken and bison >= X is good. A hint that
bison < X might be broken is fine --- but let's not pretend that
configure is smarter than the user.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-07-02 04:56:05 Re: cvs build failure
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-07-02 04:21:36 Re: cvs build failure